Sep
24
2008
2

Remote Collaboration via cineSync

We rely on iChat constantly when working on a film, mainly in text form although its very handy for directly sending EDLs/changelists & audiofiles without having to upload/download via ftp etc… This applies between cities & countries but also even between buildings or the room next door. But I recently became aware of a company/product called cineSync who have taken remote collaboration to the next level…
Quoting explanation from their own website: “cineSync is a remote review and approval tool based on Apple ® QuickTime technology. By synchronising the timeline and playback of movies, you can quickly and efficiently view your work at the same time with anyone anywhere in the world.
Build a playlist of movies, scrub to a point in a movie, playback a movie, draw on the screen with your mouse, write, circle and point to areas using the drawing tools – all synchronised in real time with everyone else in your review. You can also navigate through your playlist using Text Markers (‘Bookmarks’), transfer your movies using a built-in FTP client, import and export Final Cut Pro XML data and save your session and your drawings for future reference.
cineSync offers an unparalleled user experience, making it possible for your clients to participate in a review session without needing their own account. All they need to do is download a small self-contained package, and login using a key that is unique per-review session. Movies are never transferred through the cineSync servers, ensuring that your reviews are secure, and your media never leaves the privacy of your own file servers.”

They offer a subscription-type costing based on duration (1 month, 6 months, 1 year) and the number of users, which lends itself to charging the production on a project by project basis rather than it being a permanent service available to a facility… Apart from the obvious uses for VFX and picture editing approval, this could be very handy as a means of remotely spotting a film or scene, or reviewing temp mixes, since it is possible to embed 5.1 audio into a Quicktime file….

A friend commented: “Film post production advances towards being environmentally friendly by reducing travel imperatives, although coming along as well is the prospect that we editors may end up being like battery hens. This will no doubt be followed by a popular backlash against inhumane filmmaking with demands for labelling: “Only free-range editors were used on this production” etc…

heh heh

Written by tim in: SOUND DESIGN: | Tags: , , |
Sep
23
2008
5

Tracking the (random) flow

Ok, so I am hereby soliciting a real world/practitioners opinions here, not theories… no ‘i heard this was kinda good…’ or ‘i read this on a blog somewhere as being applicable…’
I want to know what works (or doesnt) for you… ie what software (OSX) do you use to track your ideas? From spurious/random ideas when you are inspired… through to regimented ‘tick off tasks’ type tracking on complex projects….

I’ve tried a few different apps over the last year & so far none satisfy but thus far Voodoo is winning! Maybe only because it is the most recent. Its a self fulfilling prophecy but the desire to find something better stems from a dis-satisfaction with what has been tried before…

So first I tried OSX’s built in ‘Stickies’ which is fine for what it is, but as projects get more complex using multi-multi-multi-stickies ends up in a cluttered mess, no matter how translucent I make them all… So theres a prerequisite from the outset; it needs to be modal eg i’m in sound design (general) mode, but then I am in project-specific sound design mode… but then I am in general music mode, then specific music project mode, but then back out to a web based project etc etc… Ideally I want something that will stash ideas as fast as I can generate them, but I need to be able to tag them to projects & multiple contexts…. But then re-organise them in a fairly painless intuitive way ie I dont want to ever spend time in a Microsoft Project type environment – in fact Microsoft-anything environment…

Before Voodoo I tried xPad – the ‘ultimate’ notepad.. xPad is fine (& free, god bless) but as your document list gets longer & you start wasting time re-ordering it using alphanumeric characters, you realise you have outgrown it….. my xPad virtual document drawer starts to resemble my real document drawer = messy!

then I progressed to Yojimbo which never quite caught on with me…. not sure why but I suspect its got something to do with ideas coming faster than how I (later) need to be able to find/tag/sort them…. (please convince me otherwise – do I need to do some tutorials?)

I also tried adapting a few writing apps, such as Scrivener which is great for what it is, but it IS context oriented ie great for writers, less so for free multi-genre/medium dabblers…

& then I ended up with Voodoo and I do enjoy naming files ‘tims music voodoo’ etc but I’m not sure a wiki is the best model for what I have to manage…. Although havign spent zero time with wikis of any kind (& zero ambition to…) I’m not sure my instincts can be trusted… Film projects involve very well defined (but constantly changing) schedules with multiple deadlines & all the while supervising multiple elements/people…. But then music projects starts off loose as hell, just a collection of random ideas but then slowly becomes more focused…

I suspect I am looking for something that is as loose as a random stack of A4 paper (the ultimate comparison) but meanwhile as focused as a very good calendar/scheduler (eg Now
UpToDate) crossed with the very best meta data tagged multi dimensional documents….

Is meta data the answer to everything? And if so, what program actually manages it ‘properly’ regardless of the media?

What do you use?

Until the great (somewhat boring) 2kX platform wars die out, PC users will just have to speak figuratively… but hey i still value your opinion, even if the ads that ‘helped’ convince you to buy a PC were posted on a Mac, heh heh…. but whatever, sentience is where you find it…

Written by tim in: SOUND DESIGN: | Tags: , , |
Aug
29
2008
1

Video Conferencing: the future of collaboration?

Written by tim in: SOUND DESIGN: | Tags: , |
Page 1 of 11